🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.